Trustee Hanson arrived at 6:07 p.m.

Trustee Foresta arrived at 6:12 p.m.

Trustee Pierce asked if the property is zoned AG would there be a difference in the property taxes. Mr. Barrett said that he doesn't know how the Township Assessor determines the tax, however, their motivation was not to get a portion of the property with a tax exception. Mr. Barrett said he expects, as they look to zone this piece, the property would be taxed in uniform with the nature. Trustee Pierce asked Mr. Barrett questions regarding the sanitary services and recapture of costs from sales tax revenue. Mr. Barrett said they would be pay for their proportionate share, 100% of the cost of their property front. Trustee Pierce said that if Wal Mart pays for the improvements up front, the village would be taking the risk of recapturing funds from those properties when they hook up to the system. Trustee Pierce also discussed environmental impact concerning lighting.

Mayor Maravelas reviewed several newspapers articles regarding Wal Mart and reviewed meetings he had with Mr. Barrett regarding the Wal Mart proposal. Mayor Maravelas discussed the sales tax revenue recapture proposal and how he had indicated to Mr. Barrett from the beginning that he wasn't agreeable to that. He also said that he had conversations with Mr. Barrett regarding alternate locations and Mr. Barrett said the Wal Mart company was not interested in other sites. Mr. Barrett said the Mayor was correct. Mayor Maravelas asked who is going to pay for the extension from Bodycraft to their property. Mr. Barrett said they would pay the initial costs and they are asking to recapture the expenses from the sales tax revenue.

Trustee Foresta asked village planner Bob Silhan if there are any negatives to zoning the parcel this way. Bob Silhan responded that in his opinion, no. The AG zoning is put in place to protect the adjacent properties to the North, and it insures non-commercial use in a non-residential area.

Trustee Porch asked Mr. Silhan if this would create problems, or opens the door for property owners annex property without zoning. Mr. Silhan said that someone could request it, but it doesn't mean the Board would have to approve it.

Trustee Pierce asked how wide the buffer was. Mr. Barrett said fifty feet would be zoned AG and fifty feet would be green space.

Trustee Porch asked Mr. Barrett if he had a chance to review the Valerie Kretchmer report and if he agreed or disagreed with it. Mr. Barrett said that he did review the report and that he agreed with the vast majority of the statements made in the report.

Mr. Bill Creany, Eagle Ridge Drive resident, stated that he has concerns regarding traffic, the recapture from sales tax revenue and the impact on current businesses.

Ms. Jodi Gott, Pine Hill Drive resident, discussed the AG zoning and real estate taxes. She asked that GLP resubmit originally submitted reports and minus out the AG because it is zoned at a lower rate. She believe they are proposing the AG to allow them to come in under the thirty acres that the comprehensive is changed to. She also compared the Valerie Kretchmer report to GLP's report and the percentage of businesses affected. She asked that the Village Board vote no on this proposal.

Mr. Ken Hetzel said his property is within 300 feet of the "undescribed use property" and he discussed the environmental impact on the lake. He also discussed traffic concerns.
Ms. Sandi Siegmeier, Circle Drive resident, read her letter which discussed the hometown atmosphere that Antioch has, and the economic impact the proposal will have on the downtown businesses. She asked the Board to vote no on the annexation and proposal.

Mr. Scott Keanan, St. Peter's Church deacon, said the proposal and offer of new jobs for students and seniors citizens falls short of offering jobs to working families. He said the number of working families that use the food pantry is growing. He discussed Wal Mart use of sweat shops and asked the Village Board to make a sound decision.

Mr. Larry Ellis, Trevor Road resident, stated that he hopes the Village Board is keeping an open mind. He also discussed his concerns regarding the impact on the downtown businesses, traffic, and environmental impact on the lakes and slough.

Mr Pete Bolander, Eagle Ridge Drive resident, read his letter on behalf of Eagle Ridge residents. Mr. Bolander expressed his concerns with property value and asked the Board to look at the rights of those already in the village. He feels those outside the village have more rights than those residing within the village.

Dr. Ed Abderholden, Winsor Drive resident, quoted from the book "Better not Bigger".

Ms. Mary Turner, Wood Creek Drive resident, stated she believes we need a Wal Mart and the sales tax revenue to the village will be good for the village and the schools. She also said that she didn't believe that the Wal Mart proposal would have a negative impact on properties and noted the Hunt Club Farms property and their location to the Gurnee Mills shopping center. She said that we need a place for residents to shop and that we should keep our sales tax dollars in the village.

Mr. John Schaffer, former township resident, said that he doesn't believe Wal Mart is a reputable store. He would like to see water parks or more places to have fun in the village. We need to look for a community builder, not a community breaker.

Mr. Marc Lubkeman, Linden Lane resident, said that Antioch and GLP cannot coexist. The answer is to vote no on the proposal and immediately put a moratorium on commercial development.

Mr. Bill Patterson, BJ's Formalwear business owner, said that he has issues with the Valerie Kretchmer report. He has visited several communities and feels Wal Mart would have a negative impact on the downtown businesses and the loss of the hometown feeling. He also said that he didn't agree with the sale tax revenue recapture and he asked for a fair playing field. He said, "Wal Mart shouldn't get one dime." He said he hopes the Board takes the time to study the entire impact and redo the comprehensive plan.

Ms. Pat Antonelli, Main Street resident, said through her employment at the Piggly Wiggly store she has the opportunity to talk to many people. Many customers are for the Wal Mart proposal, many are against it. She went on to say that the issue isn't Wal Mart, but how the east entrance to the village should be developed. She also said that she believes more research should be done regarding traffic, lighting, and infrastructure.

Ms. Brenda Lynter, Bridgewood Drive resident, said she doesn't feel the development is right for our community. She said that she is concerned with traffic and environmental impact and feels there are age, race and wage problems with Wal Mart stores.

Ms. Shirley Patterson, White Road resident, discussed her recent trip down Route 31 and the downtown McHenry area.

Mr. Bruce Gebert, said that he believes people are afraid of the change coming to the Antioch area and that we should embrace the project. He said that nobody wants something in their back yard, so what we're really saying is that we don't want the tax dollars. The village has gone through a tough financial time, the Mayor and Administrator Haley have balanced the budget and the town is back on track. He said that the downtown offers specialty stores and that the Antioch residents win with competition in the area. He said that we can't run a community on residential dollars only. He said, we're in a financial crisis, we need the dollars. He also said we should have faith in the Village Board of Trustees to work out the details.

Mr. Ralph Antonelli, Main Street resident, said he doesn't believe the issue is about Wal Mart. He has an issue with the process of the Board and feels all business should be discussed in the open. His impression of this Board is that they are pro development. Mr. Antonelli believes that all sides of this proposal have not been properly investigated. He asked the Board to take the time to do it right.

Ms. Mary Dimeniak, Silver Lake Avenue resident, expressed her concerns regarding traffic and the lighting impact on nearby residents and wild life. She also discussed safety and the needs for more police to patrol a 24 hour store. Ms. Dimeniak suggested that the Board work on revitalizing the industrial parks and that they take the time to consider all the facts before making a decision.

Mr. Greg Umek, Savage Road resident, read his letter and reviewed newspapers articles. Mr. Umek discussed the impact of Wal Mart on the downtown businesses. He compared Antioch to the Round Lake and Gurnee areas. He said the village officials are obligated to give detailed reports to the public.

Mr. Jack Siegmeier, Circle Avenue resident, said that he has seen a lot of passion from the residents because they care about Antioch and they want to help the community grow. He said the people are asking for the Village Board to listen to them, he thinks that the Board is listening tonight, and he hopes the Village Board does the right thing.

Mr. John Hasgar, Old Mill Trail resident, said that Antioch area is the next area for development. He asked the Board not to "swing at the first pitch" but to do research and look further down the line. The Board is being short-sighted if they're only looking at the tax revenue dollars.

Mr. Ed Dimeniak, Silver Lake Avenue resident, said that he has heard that this is a ‘done deal' however, he has heard some good questions from the Village Board. He believes, if approved, this would be the largest construction project in Antioch. He suggested that the village hire a full time consulting firm to be paid for by GLP. Mr. Dimeniak went on to discuss concerns regarding the environmental impact with pesticides and lawn chemicals. He also discussed the Wal Mart policy that allows campers being allowed to park overnight in their parking lot.

Ms. Sandra Perdlgrace, Silver Lake Road resident, expressed her concerns regarding the environmental impact. She discussed her concerns with this development being in the watershed area and the affect this may have on wells further down the line.

Ms. Dee Reeves, Fox Drive resident, discussed GLP's anticipated completion dates and compared it to the completion dates of Blockbuster Store area on Route 173. Ms. Reeves also talked about the Fox Lake development and said the community won't see one hundred percent of sales tax revenue for twelve years.

Mr. Pete Lezeau, Summerhill Court resident, said that he has been a member of the Redevelopment Commission for twelve years. He asked the Board to vote no on this proposal.

Ms. Claudette Skvarce, Lakewood Drive resident, said that she has had discussions with residents that are both for and against the Wal Mart proposal. She expressed her concerns with our residents spending their tax dollars outside of town. She said that she was on the Village Board twenty years ago when the Kmart proposal did not go through. There are several people in this audience tonight who spoke twenty years ago the same way as they did tonight. She said there are more pluses for this village with this development, twenty years is long enough, it's time to have a Wal Mart.

Ms. Garnet Carney, Hillside Avenue resident, said she believes the Village Board has been bombarded by township residents. She also said because she spoke in favor of Wal Mart, she believes her mailboxes were destroyed. She asked that we behave as civil human beings. Ms. Carney said that she has been a resident of Antioch for sixty-five years. She asked why should we have our neighboring communities get our tax dollars. She went on to say that the traffic won't get any better until it is warranted. She said the best thing for this town is a local Wal Mart store.

Ms. Alice Baker, Addison Street resident, said that she realizes that growth is important. She suggested that the Village have control and ask Wal Mart to partnership with the city of Antioch.

Ms. Jan Sternberg, Deep Lake Road resident, said that she knows that change is inevitable, but she doesn't believe that Wal Mart cares about the Antioch residents. Ms. Sternberg said that she doesn't want to live next door to a Wal Mart. She asked the Village Board to do the right thing and make the right kind of changes that is best for everyone.

Ms. June Carlberg, Grass Lake Road, said that she agrees there should be changes in the area, but she would like to see the Board look for a store with a better reputation. She hopes that Antioch will do better than Wal Mart.

Mr. Jack Fields, Asbury Court resident, said that the integrity of this town does not come from a Wal Mart store. He has heard people say that if the Wal Mart store is built, it will destroy the town. He said the integrity of this town comes from the people of the Village of Antioch and the people of Antioch Township. He hopes this town does not get destroyed over this issue. He said we voted for and put the Board in the position to make these decisions and they have a tough decision to make. He said that he agrees with a lot of statements that have been made regarding the research that needs to be done, such as design of the building and the comprehensive plan. He said whether the Board chooses to vote for this or they don't, the citizens of the village have come together with the Neumann Homes issue and this issue. He said "We have to keep showing that we are all bonding together and keep this village strong."

Attorney Anderson read aloud the following resolution:

RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE VILLAGE OF ANTIOCH TO SUBMIT PETITION FOR ISOLATED WETLAND CERTIFICATION AND TO CONTRACT WITH CERTIFIED WETLANDS SPECIALIST.

A motion was made by Trustee Pierce, seconded by Trustee Foresta to approve as read, Resolution R02-10-21, authorizing the Village of Antioch to submit petition for isolated wetland certification and to contract with certified wetlands specialist. On roll call, the vote was:
YES: 6; Pierce, Larson, Caulfield, Foresta, Porch and Hanson.
NO: 0.
THE MOTION CARRIED.

Ms. Margaret Cole, Chestnut Street resident, read her letter regarding the parking situation on Chestnut Street. During certain times when there are large functions held at the high school, cars park on both sides Chestnut Street and block residents there from getting in and out of their driveways.

Mr. John Horan, Hillside Avenue, said that Neumann Homes is on the agenda for Phase One Final Plat and he also read in the paper that Neumann Homes is asking for a variance for their wetland. Mr. Horan believes that decision regarding Phase One Final Plat should be postponed. Mr. Horan also said that he noticed that ComEd is back on the agenda. His only concern with the ComEd proposal is that he doesn't want to see a trailer park going there with truck traffic in and out.

Ms. Jodi Gott, Pine Hill Drive resident, questioned sump pumps running down peoples property and into the street. She asked if this is legal in the village. Jim Keim, staff engineer, said the village requires a storm connection. Ms. Gott believes that about fifty percent of the homes in Pine Hill Lakes subdivision have their sump pump running down into the street.

Ms. Sandi Siegmeier, Circle Avenue resident, said that a pedestrian was hit in front her store recently. Ms. Siegmeier suggested that speed limits in the downtown area be researched. This item will be placed in committee for further discussion.

The Combined Planning Commission and Zoning Board conducted a public hearing on October 17, 2002 following publication of a legal notice as required by State Law and Village Ordinance.

SITE. The phase one site is situated northwest of the intersection of Illinois Route 173 and Deep Lake Road. Two parcels (in aggregate consisting of 16.67 Acres) are within the Village limits and are zoned B-2, with the requirement that they develop as Planned Developments (P.U.D.). The two other parcels (in aggregate consisting of 14.92 Acres) are currently zoning AG in Lake County.

PROPOSAL. The proposal was presented by Tim Barrett of Great Lakes Principals, Wheaton, Illinois. He referred to two drawings, sheets SP-1 and SP-1A, prepared by Stewart Nosky, Ltd. Architects, Downers Grove, Illinois, dated 10 April 2002 and revised dated 26 September 2002. Part of the proposed Phase One of the development is being requested for a Land Use Plan and Zoning Map change, such that the result would be designation of approximately 30 acres Commercial on the Land Use Plan and B-2 on the Zoning Map. Approximately 7 acres is proposed for the stormwater detention basin and the northerly buffer-yard, which would be designated in the Plan as Rural Residential and be zoned AG.

AUDIENCE. There were four person in the audience; no one spoke in favor or in opposition to the proposal.

STAFF REVIEW. Village Planner Bob Silhan provided a verbal report. He spoke from a mark-up of the Land Use Plan and the proposed annexation plat. Staff recommends approval of the petitioner's request. Mr. Silhan referred to Goal #3 on page 14 of the Comprehensive Plan text which indicates: "Establish a balanced land use pattern with a variety of non-residential uses which will provide: an expanded tax base to support public services and facilities; increase employment and shopping opportunities; and which will not pollute the environment." This proposal is consistent with that goal.

Following the Planning and Zoning Board's deliberation, Tom Baba moved, Carol Keller seconded to recommend APPROVAL of PZB02-07-A, proposed amendments to Plate 7, Land Use Plan Map of the Comprehensive Plan and amendments to the Zoning Map relative to Great Lakes Principals proposal northwest of the intersection of Route 173 and Deep Lake Road. Upon roll call vote: YES: 4; Ipsen, LaReese, Keller and Baba. NO: 0; ABSENT: 2; McCarty and F. Johnson. The Motion Carried.

The Combined Planning Commission and Zoning Board conducted a public hearing following notification as required by State Law and Village Ordinance. The hearing began on May 9, 2002, and was continued to June 6th, July 11th and concluded on September 26th.

SITE. The site is situated northwest of the intersection of Illinois Route 173 and Deep Lake Road. Two parcels (in aggregate consisting of approximately 17 Acres) are within the Village limits and are zoned B-2, with the requirement that they develop as Planned Developments (P.U.D.). Five parcels (in aggregate consisting of approximately 48 Acres) are currently zoning AG in Lake County, and are proposed for annexation and classification to B-2 P.U.D.

PROPOSAL. The proposal presented by Great Lakes Principals, Wheaton, Illinois, consists of drawings prepared by Stewart Nosky, Ltd. Architects, Downers Grove, Illinois dated 10 April 2002 and revised 26 September 2002.

The proposed development would be constructed in two phases. Phase One, the Wal Mart Super Center is on a site of 29.9 Acres; and Phase Two is on a site of 28.21 Acres. The proposed stormwater detention basin and northerly bufferyard is proposed to be placed in the AG Zoning District.

AUDIENCE INPUT. The Planning and Zoning Board received considerable testimony from both opponents as well as proponents of the development proposal. Based upon concerns expressed by the audience, the Village retained the consulting services fo Valerie S. Kretchmer Associates, Inc., Evanston, Illinois. Within the heart of the Kretchmer report it is stated: "In a growing area much as the Antioch trade area, new stores will inevitably open to tap into the increased spending potential of th area. While not all of the new retail development will be in Antioch, it is prudent for the Village to attract a portion of it. The worst scenario would be new centers on the other side of Antioch's borders, resulting in retail sales and sales taxes going to a neighboring jurisdiction and/or school district. A balanced approach is appropriate here to ensure that new development occurs within the Village's boundaries but does not destroy the existing retail areas of the village." The report also provides examples of suburban communities within metropolitan Chicago that have both successful downtown areas and come bit box stores.

FINDINGS. Based upon staff testimony, the following are submitted as findings of fact:

1. The proposal is in substantial conformance to the Comprehensive Plan as recently amended. The requested modification of the Route 173 landscaped area as recommended by the Comprehensive Plan (200-foot building setback and 140-foot parking setback from highway centerline) is appropriate. Due to right-of-way dedication, significant grading and landscape terracing with the proposed 100-foot parking setback, and the 165 foot building setback, the spirit and intent of the Plan's recommendation are met.

2. There are existing commercial uses and commercial zoning in the immediate vicinity of the site, and part of the site is already zoning commercial.

3. As indicated by both the Lorenz report and the Kretchmer report, residential property values will not be diminished by the proposed commercial zoning. Furthermore, the petition as revised provides for AG zoning on the detention basin and the north buffer yard, thereby assuring that such parcel shall not be used for commercial purposes. The north buffer year, through grading, fencing, and landscaping will provide ample protection for the adjacent residential parcels.

4. The general welfare of the Village of Antioch and School Districts #34 and #117 is protected and enhanced by the proposed development, in that significant additional revenues will be realized by various taxing bodies. This is especially true of the school districts, which will gain substantially without any further children being added to the schools.

5. The subject property is suitable for commercial purposes, being located at the intersection of a major east-west arterial highway, Route 173, and a major north-south county route, Deep Lake Road. Adequate vehicular ingress and egress is being provided by the developer for both Route 173 and Deep Lake Road. Both roads are being improved by the developer. The proposal meets the stormwater detention requirements of the Village Code. The specific design of the detention basin provides for a meandering path for the stormwater, thereby protecting the water quality. The developer has agreed to pay his proportionate share of potable water and sanitary sewer extensions.

6. Part of the site has been zoned B-2 for thirteen years and has remained vacant. No viable proposed use for the commercially zoned properties has come before the Village.

7. The Village's need for the proposed use is significant, as indicated by the number of residents supporting the petition, and the number of residents traveling outside the Village to shop for goods at affordable prices. Significant tax dollars are currently being lost to other municipalities, and this trend will continue if the Village does not provide for expansion of its commercial tax base.

8. The Goal #3 on page 14 of the Comprehensive Plan text indicates: "Establish a balanced land use pattern with a variety of non-residential uses which will provide: an expanded tax base to support public services and facilities; increase employment and shopping opportunities; and which will not pollute the environment." This proposal is consistent with that goal.

Following the Planning and Zoning Board's deliberation, Bob McCarty moved, Carol Keller seconded to recommend APPROVAL of PZB02-07 as amended for B-2 and AG zoning with a PUD, pending annexation to the Village, and conditioned upon staff comments. Upon roll call vote: YES: 5; Ipsen, McCarty, F. Johnson, Keller and Baba. NO: 1; LaReese. The Motion Carried.

A motion was made by Trustee Pierce, seconded by Trustee Caulfield to direct the Village Attorney to draft an annexation agreement regarding PZB02-07 and place it in committee for further Board review. On roll call, the vote was:
YES: 5; Pierce, Larson, Caulfield, Foresta and Hanson.
NO: 0.
PASS: 1; Porch.
THE MOTION CARRIED.

The Combined Planning and Zoning Board reviewed the proposed final plat at the regular meeting of October 10, 2002, following posting of the agenda as required by law.

The applicant is Dennis Murphy, represented by Landscape Architect Glenn Christensen. The proposal involves the re-subdivision of 13 existing lots along with the vacation of the west end of the Buena Terrace right-of-way. The proposed subdivision consists of 9 single-family lots within the existing R-2, Single-family Residential District.

Village Planner Bob Silhan indicated that he was in favor of the proposal.

Village Engineer Jim Keim presented his report, dated October 9, 2002. Mr. Keim's concerns were the downstream drainage and the grading of proposed lots 4, 5, and 6.

Following the Board's discussion, Tom Baba moved, Carol Keller seconded that PZB02-15, the Preliminary Plat for Buena Terrace Re-subdivision for 9 single-family lots be APPROVED conditioned upon Village Engineer review and approval of the final grading of lots 4, 5, and 6 before the final plat is submitted. Upon roll call vote: YES: 6; Ipsen, F. Johnson, McCarty, LaReese, Keller and Baba. NO: 0. The Motion Carried.

A motion was made by Trustee Caulfield, seconded by Trustee Larson to authorize payment of invoices not in question and prepare manual check to Smith Engineering once invoices have been reviewed. On roll call, the vote was:
YES: 6; Pierce, Larson, Caulfield, Foresta, Porch and Hanson.
NO: 0.
THE MOTION CARRIED.

Following discussion, a motion was made by Trustee Caulfield, seconded by Trustee Foresta to authorize the Village Attorney to draft resolution indicating the intention of the Village Board regarding the use of contraband in the schools. On roll call, the vote was:
YES: 6; Pierce, Larson, Caulfield, Foresta, Porch and Hanson.
NO: 0.
THE MOTION CARRIED.

A motion was made by Trustee Hanson, seconded by Trustee Pierce to table Neumann Homes Development Agreement and Neumann Homes Settlement Agreement. On roll call, the vote was:
YES: 6; Pierce, Larson, Caulfield, Foresta, Porch and Hanson.
NO: 0.
THE MOTION CARRIED.