BOARD OF TRUSTEES, REGULAR MEETING
Municipal Building: 874 Main Street, Antioch, Illinois
August 6, 2003
7:30 p.m.
| CALL TO ORDER |
The Committee of the Whole meeting was called to order by Mayor Maravelas
at 7:02 p.m. in the Municipal Building: 874 Main Street, Antioch, IL. |
| ROLL CALL |
Roll call indicated the following Trustees were present: Pierce, Larson,
Porch, Hanson and Turner. Also present were Mayor Maravelas and Clerk Rowe.
Absent: Attorney Long and Trustee Caulfield. |
| EXECUTIVE SESSION |
A motion was made by Trustee Pierce, seconded by Trustee Larson for the
Mayor and Board of Trustees to go into executive session at 7:03 p.m. to
discuss the selection of the economic development specialist - downtown
manager position. On roll call, the vote was:
YES: 5; Pierce, Larson, Caulfield, Porch, Hanson and Turner. NO: 0. ABSENT: 1; Caulfield. THE MOTION CARRIED. |
| RETURN |
A motion was made by Trustee Porch, seconded by Trustee Larson for the Mayor
and Board of Trustees to return from executive session and resume the Committee
of the Whole meeting at 7:10 p.m. with no action taken. On roll call, the
vote was:
YES: 5; Pierce, Larson, Caulfield, Porch, Hanson and Turner. NO: 0. ABSENT: 1; Caulfield. THE MOTION CARRIED. |
| ADJOURN |
A motion was made by Trustee Hanson, seconded by Trustee Turner to adjourn
the Committee of the Whole meeting of the Board of Trustees at 7:11 p.m. |
| CALL TO ORDER |
The Special meeting of the Board of Trustees was called to order by Mayor
Maravelas at 7:30 p.m. in the Municipal Building: 874 Main Street, Antioch,
IL. |
| ROLL CALL |
Roll call indicated the following Trustees were present: Pierce, Larson,
Porch, Hanson and Turner. Also present were Mayor Maravelas, Attorney Long
and Clerk Rowe. Absent: Trustee Caulfield. |
| MOTION TO TABLE |
A motion was made by Trustee Hanson, seconded by Trustee Pierce to table
the discussion regarding the Economic Development Specialist - Downtown
Manager until the scheduled Committee of the Whole Meeting on September
15, 2003 at 7:30 p.m. The regular Board meeting will follow. On roll call,
the vote was:
YES: 5; Pierce, Larson, Caulfield, Porch, Hanson and Turner. NO: 0. ABSENT: 1; Caulfield. THE MOTION CARRIED. |
| MINUTES 2/17/03 |
A motion was made by Trustee Larson, seconded by Trustee Hanson to approve
the minutes from the February 17, 2003 meeting as presented. On roll call,
the vote was:
YES: 3; Larson, Hanson, and Maravelas. NO: 0. PASS: 3; Pierce, Porch and Turner. ABSENT: 1; Caulfield. THE MOTION CARRIED. |
| MINUTES 2/24/03 |
A motion was made by Trustee Hanson, seconded by Trustee Porch to approve
the minutes from the February 24, 2003 meeting as presented. On roll call,
the vote was:
YES: 3; Porch, Hanson and Maravelas. NO: 0. PASS: 3; Pierce, Larson and Turner. ABSENT: 1; Caulfield. THE MOTION CARRIED. |
| MINUTES 3/3/03 |
A motion was made by Trustee Hanson, seconded by Trustee Porch to approve
the minutes from the March 3, 2003 meeting as presented. On roll call, the
vote was:
YES: 3; Pierce, Porch and Hanson. NO: 0. PASS: 2; Larson and Turner. ABSENT: 1; Caulfield. THE MOTION CARRIED. |
| MINUTES 3/10/03 |
A motion was made by Trustee Hanson, seconded by Trustee Pierce to approve
the minutes from the March 10, 2003 meeting as presented. On roll call,
the vote was:
YES: 3; Pierce, Porch and Hanson. NO: 0. PASS: 2; Larson and Turner. ABSENT: 1; Caulfield. THE MOTION CARRIED. |
| MINUTES 3/17/03 |
A motion was made by Trustee Porch, seconded by Trustee Hanson to approve
the minutes from the March 17, 2003 meeting as presented. On roll call,
the vote was:
YES: 3; Pierce, Porch and Hanson. NO: 0. PASS: 2; Larson and Turner. ABSENT: 1; Caulfield. THE MOTION CARRIED. |
| U.S. CELLULAR - NORTH PARK |
Senior Planner George Sakas reviewed his memo dated July 31,2003 regarding
the U.S. Cellular tower. Mr. Sakas said there are two issues; 1. Business
of this being a village parcel, a business decision by the Board as to whether
we would lease the property for a placement of a cellular tower, and 2.
The planning and zoning issue concerning the height of the tower and the
placement of the tower in residential zoning. Anywhere in the village it
would need a variance for height. We have a 45 foot height restriction.
In any event, any parcel in the village would need to have a variance for
height. Mr. Sakas asked the Board if they see fit to move forward with business
negotiations for the tower to be placed on the site. |
| DISCUSSION |
Mayor Maravelas asked what is the life of the tower? Mr. Sakas said in the
draft lease that they gave him, he didn’t attach it to his memo, but it’s
a boiler plate lease that obviously favors them very heavily. He said the
lease was for two years and subsequent one year option. Attorney Long said
normally they run five to ten years with rolling five year options. Mayor
Maravelas asked if the lease agreement is up front? Attorney Long said that
typically they pay you, depending on the term of the lease, he hasn’t taken
look at the draft yet, in all of the leases he has ever seen, it’s a rental
situation. They come in and as soon start doing their preparation, they
start paying you monthly from that day up until the end of the lease when
they’re obligated to remove all their stuff and restore the site to the
original condition. Mayor Maravelas said in the event, say ten years from
now, the tower is not, say we go satellite, who is responsible for that.
Senior Planner George Sakas said the language in the draft lease says we would have to request them to take down the tower. He doesn’t see that as acceptable, there needs to be some sort of escrow requirement and the expiration of any lease term, they should take it down as an contractual obligation, or we should have some sort of bond or escrow, some sort of financial vehicle. Mayor Maravelas said that most likely, escrow is the way we need to go. Trustee Porch asked if Mr. Sakas is looking for approval at this point. Mr. Sakas said this is a business matter, he’s not sure as far as staff workload goes that he’s the right person to be entering into a business discussion with these folks. He suggested that it be the Village Attorney or Village Administrator would be more appropriate. Trustee Porch asked if he needs to know if the Village Board is interested in this lease? Attorney Long said the siting has to be approved by the Planning and Zoning Board, but all you could do is suggest in general terms that a cellular tower somewhere in that area is something worth beginning negotiations on. The Planning and Zoning Board would have to do the actual siting. Mr. Sakas, asked if this needs to go before Planning and Zoning for the variation before the Village Board, he doesn’t understand Attorney Long’s comments. Attorney Long said that all you can do is state you want this, we would generally like a cellular tower in that area with the specific siting has to be done by the Planning and Zoning Board, and at the same time, the negotiations for whatever lease that is going to be on village property can be dealt with at the staff levels. Interim Administrator, Robert Silhan asked for direction from the Village Board if it is worth pursuing this petition before the Planning and Zoning Board. He said we don’t have to make a decision other than do we refer it to the Planning and Zoning Board at this time. Mr. Sakas explained the Planning and Zoning Board deadlines to be placed on their agenda. Trustee Larson asked if the Village Board can legally discuss what this is going to look like? Can we do that now? Attorney Long said that you can state your preferences if you would like a lattice tower versus a monopole. Trustee Larson said that she is talking about the size of the tower. She discussed the June 23, 2003 memo that states it’s a stand alone tower that will be 150' to 190' high. She wanted everyone to realize this is approximately three times the height of our existing water towers and it will have a 40' x 40' blueprint. She wanted everyone to understand the size of this in a residential neighborhood. Trustee Pierce said that we have two issues here, one is the Planning and Zoning Board have to review the variance and he thinks we should have a motion tonight to send it to the Planning and Zoning Board. At the same time, if we’re looking to initiate discussion on a business agreement, he thinks we need to take close look at this because if you look the height of water tower, the area that is covers is so large. They will be making a lot of money off of one tower. Trustee Pierce suggested that whoever is negotiating on the lease, should negotiate on the very high end. This tower, if installed, would give them a tremendous amount of customers. Mayor Maravelas said it would be $2500.00. Trustee Pierce said he thinks that’s way too low. Mr. Sakas said per his memo U.S. Cellular is looking at as absolutely close to the Wisconsin Board as they can go. Trustee Larson asked how do we compensate these two homeowners who are going to have this in their backyard. Their property values, she would guess, would decrease because of this. They bought property adjoining a park, and now when they look out their back window at an almost 200' tall cell tower. Trustee Turner said she can’t see doing this to them. Trustee Porch asked Mr. Sakas if we have any other free standing cellular towers in the Village of Antioch. Mr. Sakas said there are none currently. Mr. Sakas said one of the planning and zoning risks here, and Attorney Long may be able to help him out, is that cell towers have to go somewhere. We have two cell antennas on two of our water towers. He said if this tower doesn’t go on village property, and they go to a private property owner, the private property owner would still have to get a variance for the height. If that is disallowed, we’re in the position where, we’re promoting and accepting rent from wireless phone providers on our water towers, but we’re not allowing it to go to private property. Attorney Long said that’s not really the problem, the real problem is
the Wireless Telecommunications Act gives very little discretion to village’s
about cell towers. We can site location, with only a limited expense,
because if they make a determination, from a scientific point of view,
that the tower has to go in that location because it has to be a certain
height and it has to reach certain coverage, they can file an injunction
in the Federal Court and we could be stuck with them whether we like or
not. Trustee Larson said then why don’t charge them $500,000 a month.
Attorney Long said that’s the other thing that we can’t do, because it’s
also part of the Act. Attorney Long discussed a federal lawsuit in the
Village of Fox Lake. Trustee Larson asked if we are required, on our park
property, we have a park board that makes recommendations on what goes
on there? Attorney Long said, no that’s not what he’s saying. What he’s
saying is that when they come up with a range of an area in which they
need to site this thing, we’re obligated to work with them to come up
with the best possible solution, we have to allow a solution. Trustee
Larson said we looked at a parcel further to the west and to the north,
and they felt it was cost prohibitive to them. They would have to put
in a road in and run the utilities further, they’re looking to get away
as cheaply as they can with this thing, on the back of these homeowners
who are going to have to look at it day in and day out. Trustee Hanson
asked why can’t we make it move it back there? Attorney Long said that
there are limitations on our powers, it doesn’t mean we don’t have power,
you have to be careful. You don’t want to get into a situation where you
tell them they can’t put it on park property, and then tell them they
can’t put it on private property either. Mayor Maravelas said if they
are willing to work with and pay the village, fine. Trustee Pierce wants
to make sure of two things, one, we go through the process and we follow
the law and secondly, he wants to make sure the Village doesn’t financially
get ripped off. He believes there are a lot of implications to this, that
are a lot different than what we have on top of a water tower. Mayor Maravelas
said that he checked with another individual, who is semi-retired, on
that property and he was advised, and he told them he would be looking
for $2500.00 a month, they told me that’s pretty good rent. Trustee Porch
said if we currently have cell towers on top of our water towers that
are 75' tall, why would be asked to double or triple that? The other cellular
companies are happy with the 75', would we be in violation of the Act,
if we use that height as our requirement. Attorney Long said the reason
they’re looking for is two-fold. First off, the guy that’s at the top
of the tower is the guy that developed the tower, usually and they have
the biggest range. They also put banks on these towers, so about every
thirty-five or forty feet there is another bank on that antenna. They
sublease space on those towers to other companies. He went on to say that
he negotiated in other situations, there is a per bank charge, where it’s
$2000.00 for the top and $1000.00 for bank on the tower. Attorney Long
said, “do you have to allow a 175' tower, not necessarily. Do you have
to allow a tower high enough to accomplish the general rules of meeting
the coverage area, yes.” He said generally speaking, if you’re going to
stuck with this, what you can do is at least spread the expense to as
many people in this town by getting some benefit for the benefit of the
tax payers to help you relieve the burden in general. Trustee Turner how
do we explain to the homeowners? Attorney Long said he’s not saying it
should close next to the houses, he hasn’t seen all the documentation
yet. There was a discussion regarding the location of the proposed tower
in relation to the residences. |
| VB MOTION |
A motion was made by Trustee Pierce, seconded by Trustee Hanson to refer
the U.S. Cellular tower proposal to the Planning and Zoning Board. |
| DISCUSSION |
Trustee Larson said do we need a motion to forward this to Planning and
Zoning Board, isn’t that their right? Attorney Long said they would normally
petition it. Attorney Long asked if they are ready to submit to the Planning
and Zoning Board. George Sakas, Senior Planner, said that the village would
have to petition, it’s our own property. Trustee Larson asked which site
are we talking about? Trustee Hanson said, “if we are the petitioner, we
should pick the site.” |
| MOTION DISCUSSION |
Mr. Sakas said they prefer the site presented this evening, we need one
person to negotiate with them regarding the site and the lease. Trustee
Porch said shouldn’t we negotiate first? The motion and second was withdrawn. |
| AUTHORIZE NEGOTIATION |
A motion was made by Trustee Pierce, seconded by Trustee Hanson to authorize
Mayor Maravelas and the Village Attorney to negotiate with U.S. Cellular
regarding the placement of the cell tower and report the results back to
the Village Board. On roll call, the vote:
YES: 4; Pierce, Larson, Hanson and Turner. NO: 1; Porch ABSENT: 1; Caulfield THE MOTION CARRIED. |
| TRUSTEE PORCH |
Trustee Porch reported that the August 7, 2003 Redevelopment Commission
meeting has been cancelled. |
| WILLIAM E. BROOK |
Trustee Porch said the new bronze plaques are up at the William E. Brook
Memorial Wetland Sanctuary and Entertainment Center. She thanked those who
donated their time and money for development of the sanctuary and entertainment
center. |
| AUTHORIZE PAYMENT |
A motion was made by Trustee Porch, seconded by Trustee Pierce to authorize
payment of accounts payable as prepared by the Village Treasurer. On roll
call, the vote was:
YES: 5; Pierce, Larson, Porch, Hanson and Turner. NO: 0. ABSENT: 1; Caulfield. THE MOTION CARRIED. |
| MANUAL CHECKS |
A motion was made by Trustee Porch, seconded by Trustee Larson to approve
the manual checks written to date for the Dolly Spiering Fund ($1,605.48),
General ($234,566.41), Brook Memorial Fund ($4,830.00), Water and Sewer
($157,620.94), and the Payroll ($29,161.72) accounts as presented. On roll
call, the vote was:
YES: 5; Pierce, Larson, Porch, Hanson and Turner. NO: 0. ABSENT: 1; Caulfield. THE MOTION CARRIED. |
| FINANCIAL STATEMENT |
A motion was made by Trustee Porch, seconded by Trustee Turner to approve
the May 31, 2003 Financial Statement as prepared by the Village Treasurer.
On roll call, the vote was:
YES: 5; Pierce, Larson, Porch, Hanson and Turner. NO: 0. ABSENT: 1; Caulfield. THE MOTION CARRIED. |
| R03-21 |
Clerk Rowe read aloud the Resolution opening a new bank account for the
proposed new village tower clock. A motion was made by Trustee Porch, seconded
by Trustee Hanson to approve Resolution No. 03-21, entitled, Resolution
Opening a New Bank Account for the proposed New Village Tower Clock, and
open the account with the $25,000 Village donation. On roll call, the vote
was:
YES: 5; Pierce, Larson, Porch, Hanson and Turner. NO: 0. ABSENT: 1; Caulfield. THE MOTION CARRIED. |
| CONCEPT PROPOSAL- WATER STORAGE AT “CLUBLANDS” |
Robert Silhan, Interim Administrator reviewed his memo dated 8/1/03 regarding
the conceptual proposal - public works, wells and water storage at “Clublands”.
The memo follows: |
| WATER STORAGE |
PROBLEM / SITUATION The Village in conjunction with Neumann Homes has been
attempting to find a physically and economically feasible location for a
water storage facility. Village Staff has met with representatives of Neumann
Homes several times to discuss alternatives.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1) The 55-Acres owned by Neumann Homes has been discussed as a possibility. Difficulties in the actual siting involved space needed for the proposed commercial site and the proposed school site, and also the proximity of the Gade landing strip immediately west of the parcel. 2) At one time the one-acre parcel at the northwest corner of Route 173 and Deep Lake Road, (not part of the GLP site), was discussed. The site is owned by others who are now marketing the site due to its adjacency to the Wal-Mart site. 3) Recently, we’ve considered the 17-Acre public park site within the Clublands development. Attached is a conceptual sketch dated 7/25/2003. A 40,000 square foot public works area could be dedicated at the northeast corner of the site. This would include a water storage facility and well house. It could also include other Public Works facilities, including a garage to store a snow plow as well as Parks Department equipment. There are several other advantages to this location for the water storage for the water storage tank, including the possibility of a future concession stand and washroom facilities for the park and playground. Due to the land dedication, we already have this land under control. Our strong preference for the water storage tank is that it be a ground storage tank, rather than an elevated tower. However, further detailed analysis, we are requesting the Board’s concurrence with this general concept. RECOMMENDATION I recommend that the Board direct staff in conjunction with Neumann Homes to proceed with a detailed analysis of the Clublands Public Park as a site for this Public Works, Parks Department storage, wells and water storage facility. Bob Silhan said he was looking for conceptual approval so we can proceed with a more detailed analysis. He doesn’t want to spend a lot of time and money on a detailed analysis if the Board doesn’t agree with concept. Trustee Larson asked if we’ll get more information before we make a final decision. A motion was made by Trustee Hanson, seconded by Trustee Larson to allow
staff to do a detailed analysis of the proposal. |
| DISCUSSION | Trustee Pierce said this is wrong. We spent three years negotiating with Neumann Homes, we have 17 acres out of them and we would be giving them an acre back so they can put the facilities feed their property. If you look at what they’re doing, they’re moving softball and baseball fields, that kids would be using, over to take over 40,000 square feet and potential concession stands. He went on to say, that if he remembers correctly, they were going to put washrooms in there, as part of their negotiations with the Forest Preserve, so water has to be there if they’re doing that. Trustee Pierce said he doesn’t think there’s any benefit to the Village. He also said instead of a centralized concession stand in the center of all four fields, you would have to ut one off to the side. He said that he thinks it’s wrong and we shouldn’t proceed forward with it, and we should direct Neumann Homes, at their expense, to find a spot that works for them. Trustee Porch asked Jim Keim to respond to Trustee Pierce’s opinion. Staff Engineer Jim Keim said the alternative would be that the Village may be obligated in final analysis to come up with a cash payment. He doesn’t know if Neumann Homes is in obligated in anyway to find the site. He said although this definitely benefits them, obviously their residents, and Pulte, so far, will benefit from this power and well storage production. He’s not sure that if we don’t go forward on this, we could be in a situation that could be costly to the village. Robert Silhan said he believed that’s correct. He believe the Development Agreement / Settlement Agreement is such that, if this site is not acceptable, which we already have under control basically, we don’t have to expend any money for this site, we may be looking at an expense to get another site. Trustee Pierce would like to see that in writing. Jim Keim said he believes the Development Agreement that says that we have the obligation to provide adequate water. It doesn’t say anything about this particular site, but we are obligated to supply adequate amount of water. Attorney Long suggested he review the agreements with staff to see what our obligations are. Trustee Hanson and Trustee Larson amended their motion to included staff and attorney review. |
| MOTION |
A motion was made by Trustee Hanson, seconded by Trustee Larson to authorize
the Village Attorney to work with staff to review the agreements to determine
what our obligations are regarding the request for conceptual public works
proposal at Clublands park. Trustee Larson and Trustee Hanson withdrew their
motion and second.
Jim Keim said time crunch comes into play, we have a portion of the development
out there, at some point and time construction will cease unless we find
a suitable site. He said there is a year lead time to get storage tanks
ordered, there are all the permits through IEPA, test wells, all that
stuff takes a lot of time. We need to work Neumann to time this correctly.
He doesn’t want to get into any legal jeopardy with them in the case we
don’t act appropriately and they end up not having water. Robert Silhan
reported they have sold 120 homes already, they’re at a point where they
want to file for plan commission review and approval of Unit 2 in Neu
Haven and Clublands. Part of the reason it’s not on the Plan Commissions
agenda is because they can’t service those homes. There may be a bit of
a Catch 22 if we delay it a lot longer. Mr. Silhan said that waiting until
the next Board meeting is a particular problem. Attorney Long said we
will have an answer by the next meeting. This item will be placed on the
August 18 village board agenda. |
| MOTION TO TABLE |
A motion was made by Trustee Pierce, seconded by Trustee Turner to table
the discussion regarding the conceptual proposal, public works, wells and
water storage, “Clublands” park until the August 18, 2003 Village Board
meeting. On roll call, the vote was:
YES: 5; Pierce, Larson, Porch, Hanson and Turner. NO: 0. ABSENT: 1; Caulfield. THE MOTION CARRIED. |
| 416 ORCHARD STREET |
Trustee Hanson reviewed the memo dated 7/31/03 from Bob Silhan, Interim
Administrator regarding the quotes received for demolition of village owned
property at 416 Orchard Street. The quotes received are:
Diemer Plumbing & Excavating, Ltd. $8,950, not including asbestos inspection,
sampling and removal A motion was made by Trustee Hanson, seconded by Trustee Pierce to award the contract to Fox Trucking & Excavating, Inc. for their quote of $8794.00 to demolish the house and garage at 416 Orchard Street and waive the formal bidding process. On roll call, the vote was: YES: 5; Pierce, Larson, Porch, Hanson and Turner. NO: 0. ABSENT: 1; Caulfield. THE MOTION CARRIED. |
| LIQUOR LICENSE |
A motion was made by Trustee Larson, seconded by Trustee Pierce to issue
a one-day beer and wine liquor license to the St. Peter’s Church for the
Benefit for Mother Theresa Home, waiving the fee. The event will held on
September 7, 2003.
Trustee Porch said the application indicates a bike run She asked if we know what means. Trustee Pierce said that is a valid question, and there may be a need for police services. Clerk Rowe will have Spiro Deligiannis find out the information and notify the police department, if needed, and to update the Village Board. On roll call, the vote was: YES: 5; Pierce, Larson, Porch, Hanson and Turner. NO: 0. ABSENT: 1; Caulfield. THE MOTION CARRIED. |
| TRUSTEE LARSON |
Trustee Larson thanked village employees Tom Dvorak and Laurie Stahl for
their help with the Friends of the Park event held at Sawmill Park last
Saturday.
Antioch Girls 9 & 10 year olds softball team is one game away from the
State Championship. Their next game will be played at Williams Park tomorrow
night at 6:00 p.m. they have not lost a game yet. If they win, they win
the State Championship for the second year in a row. Paul Howard, Senior
Center Coordinator is one of the coaches. Trustee Larson asked that everybody
come out and cheer them on, they are incredible watch. |
| SEWER REHAB |
A motion was made by Trustee Pierce, seconded by Trustee Turner to authorize
staff to go out for bid for the collection systems, sewer rehab program.
Staff Engineer Jim Keim said this is for our entire collection system as it relates to the IEPA issues we have. The Board directed him to look at a couple of alternatives and gives you pros and cons. He’s still looking at alternatives and the more he looks at this, it’s a very complicated situation, going after the IEPA funding versus a bond issue. In any event, going out for bid at this point is a good idea to make sure it’s a valid project. We have an estimated cost of $1.6 million. He said that he is working with Bond Consultant Harold Warren and Smith Engineering to get all the pros and cons for going in either direction. Jim Keim will report at the next board meeting. On roll call, the vote was: YES: 5; Pierce, Larson, Porch, Hanson and Turner. NO: 0. ABSENT: 1; Caulfield. THE MOTION CARRIED. |
| SENIOR CENTER |
Trustee Pierce discussed the estimates received regarding the Senior Center
expansion. A motion was made by Trustee Pierce, seconded by Trustee Porch
to authorize staff to go out for bid for the addition and remodeling of
the Antioch Senior Center and report back to Village Board what those bids
are.
Trustee Larson asked if the them work with the architect. Bob Silhan, Interim Administrator indicated the bids will be based on his plans and specs. Mr. Silhan said they could be higher. This is like any bidding process, we have the right to reject any and all bids. On roll call, the vote was: YES: 5; Pierce, Larson, Porch, Hanson and Turner. NO: 0. ABSENT: 1; Caulfield. THE MOTION CARRIED. |
| EXECUTIVE SESSION |
A motion was made by Trustee Porch, seconded by Trustee Turner for the Mayor
and Board of Trustees to go into executive session at 8:30 p.m. to discuss
pending litigation and personnel. On roll call, the vote was:
YES: 5; Pierce, Larson, Porch, Hanson and Turner. NO: 0. ABSENT: 1; Caulfield. THE MOTION CARRIED. |
| RETURN |
A motion was made by Trustee Larson, seconded by Trustee Turner for the
Mayor and Board of Trustees to return from executive session at 9:10 p.m.
and resume the regular meeting with no action taken. On roll call, the vote
was:
YES: 5; Pierce, Larson, Porch, Hanson and Turner. NO: 0. ABSENT: 1; Caulfield. THE MOTION CARRIED. |
| ADJOURN |
A motion was made by Trustee Porch, seconded by Trustee Pierce to adjourn
the special meeting of the Board of Trustees at 9:11 p.m. |
____________________
Candi L. Rowe, Clerk